‘Engage Engines Scotty’. As Captain James T. Kirk utters this directive to his crew, the Starship ‘Enterprise’ launches towards its destination with the greatest of ease.
How we might wish our organization could change position so quickly… maybe you can.
It has been my great privilege to work with disaffected managers and team leaders. I say privilege because there is no doubt in my mind that this is where we can make the greatest difference to the success of an organization in the shortest period of time.
Most leadership development effort, money and time is spent with the upper echelons of an organization. These are the highest paid, well-educated and highly adaptable people, who display their ability in the board room and on the executive floors. Here people read, study and discuss the latest theories by eminent thought leaders. In fact many are prominent thought leaders themselves whose words are poured over and dissected by the leanest, fittest brains in their organization. Often papers are produced describing new observations in the market before disseminating how these latest signs and signals can drive better practices into the business, to gain a competitive advantage.
Well, someone has to do it.
Meanwhile deep down in the murky depths of an organization there are a different group of leaders working, managing and communicating. Here are people whose purpose is often quite different from that of the corporate leadership team. They often work to a different set of rules. This group will assume a veneer of the corporate culture as defined by the finely crafted corporate values designed to show them how they should behave, the mission statement pointing to why they are there and the organization vision of Shangri-La. Sometimes, (when it suits), these statements are referenced by this group of leaders but only to achieve their own agenda. They inhabit a different culture; one with it’s their own mindset. One which Gerard Egan called the ‘shadow side’. (Working the Shadow Side, 1994)
This group operates in most organizations. They are your team leaders and line managers. Employees respond to them. After all that’s why they were put there. You may recognize some of the signs of the shadow side at work; the world of intrigue, ‘the buck doesn’t stop here’ cc’d emails, and the ability to articulate, when necessary, the rhetoric which will make them look good to those at the next level.
This is a Darwinian culture, where it’s not the strong who survive, but the most flexible. The strongest disappeared with the first whiff of corporate change when they made their misguided stand to support the old ways! Whereas those that adapted quickly became recognized as the best people to take the organization forward and they represent the greatest opportunity to transform an organization rapidly. Let me explain.
As far back as 1992 in ‘Transfer of Training’ Broad and Newstrom identified a number of studies which showed that only 10% of the expenditure on training results in “any observable behavior change on the job”. (Little has changed in the intervening years!) The common perception is that the most impact on transfer of training into work place practice is created by the trainer during the training. In fact, Broad and Newstrom showed that the most impact on transfer lies with the line manager particularly before the training takes place.
Training is little different from any other form of communication, change or improvement. How much actually results in “any observable behavior change on the job”? We now start to understand that the driver of improvement in all organizations is the team leaders and line managers. Whatever the Corporate Leadership Team disseminates this group have the absolute power to make things happen or make things murky.
We all must have seen how our shadow leaders can galvanize their team into a frenzy of negativity about the most trivial change, they can ‘dismiss’ the message from the CEO with a simple ‘it’s just another message from on high’, even effortlessly tie an organization in knots with ‘a rumor about a possible…’.
Shadow leaders can galvanize their team into a frenzy of negativity about the most trivial change.” Tweet this!
Alternatively… given the right conditions, they can be the engine room which propels the ship forward leaving the officers on the bridge to steer the best course.
When this team is at their flexible adaptable best they can find improvement, reduce waste, and improve patient / customer care at the drop of a hat. They can engage their teams to go the extra mile even when there isn’t a crisis. We have put them in the perfect position to deliver rapid improvement. This is why I believe we should pay more attention to this talented group.
Before you say that you already do this I refer you back to the work of Broad and Newstrom. To ensure that training of team leaders and line managers is quickly transferred into improved workplace practice they also need to be integral to the support of this development. In this way if we invest more in the development of their skills, open their minds and help them adjust their rules they are then in a position to make a real difference, very quickly.
In the words of Captain Jean-Luc Picard ‘Make it so, number one’.
Hi Dave
I liked your article and it reminded me of my days in local government sector almost to a T. I was also struck by David Hain’s take on the article too. As a former Head of Service, I spent all my workforce development money on the workforce and none on myself! I also invested in engaging with staff to identify what would work best for them … and also looked beyond traditional ‘death by Power Point’ approaches., with pre-event and post-event briefing and follow up. However, in 7 years as a Head of Service in Sunderland, my service was seen as anachronistic and not ‘normal’! Now I’m glad to know I was ahead of the curve!
Thanks
John
Sorry John I missed your comment. Your approach was certainly not the norm from my experience. even now I don’t believe much has changed hence the blog.
Thanks
Dave
“It has been my great privilege to work with disaffected managers and team leaders…there is no doubt in my mind that this is where we can make the greatest difference to the success of an organization in the shortest period of time.”
I could not agree more Dave! These are the people who are actively building the bridge to the future in any organization, translating vision and strategy into action. Investing in them is critical. That is where leadership development in particular can make the biggest impact on an organization. By development I mean training, coaching, and mentoring vs. training alone. Yet that is not where the biggest investment in leadership development is typically made. Nonetheless I’ve found that this band of people in an organization often makes the best and easiest to observe use of that investment.
Interestingly I had a meeting with a key figure in one of the UK’s government departments yesterday who intellectually understood this concept but said it was too hard!
Their argument was that it would demand the organisation put more resource into these people and how could they get someone in the organisation to take the responsibility!
I was up against engrained mindsets and a set of rules / ways of working which needed to be challenged.
Then again, that’s why we love our work!
Dave
Great points and exactly what we experience here in Australia too. I run the People Power Leadership Development Program specifically for middle managers as I see their key linchpin roles as critical to developing and sustaining a company culture.
Hi Heidi
Thanks for your comments. I always think it’s a shame more organisations don’t invest more in these layers of leadership. From our comments so far this seems to be a worldwide issue.
Dave
Dave,
I love your well chosen words “disaffected managers and team leaders” for it has been my privilege to — to work with them like you.
Your word ‘privilege’ is also well chosen because these managers and team leaders for we get to see untapped potential come to life in front of our eyes. We get to celebrate their journey and their success!
Oh yes, you are spot on when you say that the middle counts in terms of real change. Declarations from the top can float in the muck of of the middle when upper level leaders disaffect these managers.
Great post!
Kate
I’m now going to steal the phrase ‘Muck in the Middle’. Great title for a blog
Thanks
Dave
Dave, You had me at the Capt. Kirk comment. In all seriousness, excellent points. I especially like your mention of how in most leadership development efforts, money and time is being spent with the upper echelons of an organization. I see this all to often. It can be a culture killer and performance killer. Leaders need to be mentored and developed early and often, not just once they reach the top, but on the their way to the top!
Couldn’t agree more Scott. How is we all know this and yet organisations pay so little attention to it.
Dave
I think the big reason, most orgs. are focused on the bottom line, money. What they often fail to focus on is the role people play in achieving that bottom line, whom without them, they would have no money. One of the many catch 22’s of many organizations. Related to the topic of leadership, and your post, I think you may enjoy this artcile: http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2012/03/05/five-leadership-lessons-from-james-t-kirk
Dave – Thank you for this thought-provoking post. Yes – how often we overlook the “power” of the team leaders and line managers to influence their team members, and therefore, the flow of the organization. In addition, I concur with David Hain’s reference to Lombardo and Eichinger’s (KornFerry/Lominger) 70-20-10 approach to development. Learning occurs in the real-life doing – as painful as it may be. You’ll find their work very interesting.
Thank you for this reminder to focus on the shadow leaders!
Thanks Susan
With two recommendations for Lombardo and Eichinger they are definately on my research list.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts Dave.
I completely agree that it is a privilege to work wih disaffected managers and team leaders. I have a littlebit more difficulties with your sayings about the he upper echelons of an organization. In many organizations this upper level do not really correspond with your very positive description nevertheless they are trying to do their best. But sometimes also in an unhandy way. When they are not setting the marks and lead by example it can be very hard to have or create engaged team leaders and line managers who are as you say the engine of an organization.
If more top level leaders would be like Kirk, engines would run very smoothly and propels the ship forward.
Kind regards,
Joan
Hi Joan
Many thanks. I was giving Leaders the benefit of the doubt. After all we would surely expect our Leaders to be the font of wisdom and great practice, wouldn’t we? Maybe, if Team Leaders and Line Managers held their Leaders to account more often they might get the leadership they need. Is this possible?
Dave
I have seen companies rewarding behavior that contradict its own goals. Or even departments that get bonuses for doing work that will not benefit the entire organization. To get the engine running smoothly they need to align the bonuses and incentives in order to get the fuel to burn in the right place. – Great article Dave.
Thanks. I’m always surprised by the way organisations create contradictory processes. Reward and recognition often goes through a complex system which takes away any spontaneity and proper Leadership. Aligning everything to the purpose of the organisation, including training and development is so neglected.
Aye, aye Cap’n! Right on the money Dave.
Too many senior people spend big on their own development and think that signing off a bill means that they are supporting their people. How about briefing pre programme, debriefing after, looking for opportunities to put learning into practice – or even real diagonal slice training for behaviour change across/between organisations?
I must say I’m also attracted by the work of Lombardo & Eichinger on 70:20:10. They state the odds of learning (and hopefully behaviour change) as”:
about 70% from on-the-job experiences, tasks, and problem solving.
about 20% from feedback and from working around good or bad examples of the need.
about 10% from courses and reading.
Plenty of places in the learning universe for leaders to boldly go…!
Thanks for your reminder.
David
Hi David
I agree entirely. The more Leaders do to leverage their investment the better. I’ll look up Lomardo and Eichinger thanks for the reference